CO129-541-11 Cheng Kwok Yau- trial judge's notes 1-1-1932 - 31-12-1932 — Page 27

27

admissible. Crow endeavours to prove complicity in Orime A,by

bstablishing complicity in Orime B. Same contentio by Assistant

Attorney General before Magistrate. This videos calculated to

prejudice prisoner with Jury. If relevant,relevanoy must be con

firmed to appropriate issues.Reads; Lindsell,s speech(1.9 ao.).

Any intention to kill in mind of scoused irrelemnt witil he is

ehemi aliunde to be Lu's principal. Would aubmit samý argument

if secusod had been indicted for "murder".

Lindsell+8(speech p.16) went before Magistrate with Zimmer and

Christie's evidence alo:19. (P.81) must have been he &o." A general

invitation to Jury to realy for all issues upon the 2 a 0.evidence.

Cheldon ́s uldress to Jury(fuml), Contains language of nrejudice.

Summing up : Judge adopted Crown view.

(C.J. R. Point 1(9):"This relates to possible misdirection in

summing up and was reserved, subject to it being open in law to me to reserve it")

Judge puts evidence of Zimmern & Christie,na a whole to Jury.

(0.5. Evidence used to prove (a) motive and (b) agmoy)

Adjourned.

Resumed, 2.30 p.m.

Potter r #UN98;-

R2: L22 W

9 Hulabury pp.380, 381. 6.740, 8.742.

13 Halabury. P.43",P.438. $.609. P.439.8.011. P.447.8.621 •

Instruction to Leu prior to 20th March(date of 2 & 0.evidenos).

Archbold: 28th,sition;P.565 «Evidence which may not be given"

£180 P.370,P.1. "R.v.Buckley" 18 Cox 295(Verdict:"Not guilty").

R.v.01swea" 4 0 & P.901.

13 Halsbury pp.481,482,453.8.rgr. 8.age(proof of agmoy);8.627.

Asst: Law of video "10th Ed.5.453 à 458. 11th.Ed.pp.428,430.

*00-inoid seo" is not evidenos. (G.J.:*Not evidee if Ros gestue-

Zimmóri & Christie's evideos"). 13 Halsbury p.420 8.585 "Rea

gestsa", "Porking, v„Jeffrey" (1918) 2.K.8.702.

«Makin.v.A.G.OP N.8.4." (1894) A.0.57.

*F.v.Bond* (1900) 2.K.B.389.

Adjourned.